Monolinguals' and Bilinguals' Use of Language in Forming Novel Object Categories
نویسندگان
چکیده
Monolinguals and bilinguals differ along a number of dimensions, including way they label existing object categories (Pavlenko & Malt, 2011). In the present study, we ask whether English monolinguals, Spanish-English bilinguals, and English-Spanish bilinguals also differ in the way they use language when forming novel categories. Previous research with monolinguals shows that a shared label encourages children (e.g., Waxman & Markow, 1995) and adults (e.g., Lupyan, Rakison, & McClelland, 2007) to place objects together. Our results further demonstrate that when two objects shared a Licit Word label like “zeg,” monolinguals and bilinguals alike are encouraged to group them together. Illicit Words like “gxz,” on the other hand, only influence the categorization decisions of bilinguals. Thus, bilinguals appear to be more flexible in their use of linguistic information in categorization. Neither group made use of non-linguistic cues (patterned frames), suggesting a unique role for language in category formation.
منابع مشابه
Collocational Processing in Two Languages: A psycholinguistic comparison of monolinguals and bilinguals
With the renewed interest in the field of second language learning for the knowledge of collocating words, research findings in favour of holistic processing of formulaic language could support the idea that these language units facilitate efficient language processing. This study investigated the difference between processing of a first language (L1) and a second language (L2) of congruent col...
متن کاملEnglish Vocabulary Learning Strategies: the Case of Iranian Monolinguals vs. Bilinguals
The main objective of the present study was to investigate the differences between Iranian EFL monolinguals and bilinguals in terms of vocabulary language learning strategies. In fact, it was an attempt to investigate whether bilingual/ monolingual learners differ significantly in using vocabulary learning strategies. To this end, 70 EFL, 45 monolingual (Persian) and 25 bilingual (Arabic-Persia...
متن کاملComparative Study of Degree of Bilingualism in Lexical Retrieval and Language Learning Strategies
This study compares lexical retrieval amongst monolinguals and intermediate bilinguals and advanced bilinguals. It also investigates the possible effects of their language learning strategies on their respective lexical retrieval advantage. The study used a mixed methods design and the groups consisted of 20 Persian near-monolinguals, 20 Persian-English intermediate level bilinguals, and 20 Per...
متن کاملCAPT and its Effect on English Language Pronunciation Enhancement: Evidence from Bilinguals and Monolinguals
Nowadays there are several challenges for English teachers as well as researchers regarding how to teach foreign language pronunciation more effectively. The current study aimed to explore the effect of computer-assisted pronunciation teaching (CAPT) on Persian monolinguals and Turkmen- Persian and also Baloch- Persian bilinguals’ pronunciation considering production and perception. A sample of...
متن کاملSemantic Convergence in Bilinguals
Recent evidence suggests that bilinguals’ lexical mappings for their two languages converge on a common naming pattern. The present paper investigates how semantic convergence affects the category centers and the category boundaries in the two languages of a bilingual. For common household objects, we found that the prototypes for corresponding categories in a bilingual’s two languages were mor...
متن کامل